|
Photon and Charged clusters |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Photon and Charge Clusters | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ideally how should a photon and charged particle cluster look like ? Ideally one can make the following comparative statements for clusters due to photon track and clusters due to charged particle track.
1. Photon cluster will deposit more energy in the sensitive medium of the detector than the cluster due to charged particle. 2. Photon cluster will hit more number of cells in the detector than the cluster due to charged particle. These features are then used to discriminate a photon cluster from a hadron cluster. One expects a hadron to be a MIP and deposit some minimum energy (2.5 keV) and hit only one cell, as seen in test beam studies.What can go wrong ? 1. A low energy photon may have most of it's shower get absorbed in the convertor material. It may then deposit less energy and hit lower number of cells. So convertor thickness is important. 2. A charged particle may interact with the convertor material (for 3X0 the interaction probability is about 10%). It may then deposit more energy and hit larger number of cells. So convertor thickness is important. 3. The clustering algorithm in it's attempt to separate overlaping clusters may split a photon cluster into many small clusters. Small both in energy deposition and number of cells in a cluster. What do we observe ?
So it is important to put a energy deposition cut also.
Let us understand how does the photon clusters with Ncell = 1 and Ncell > 1 differ in transverse momentum and Energy of the photon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last modified Tuesday 15 February 2000 by
Bedanga Mohanty [bmohanty@veccal.ernet.in]
|
| ||||||||||||||